← All articles

// incident response · guide

Incident Response: What To Do in the First 24 Hours

INCIDENT RESPONSE

Early decisions can affect containment, evidence and recovery. This is a general planning guide, not an emergency-response service or a substitute for your incident plan. Priorities and timing depend on safety, business impact and the facts available.

Firstcontain Nextassess scope Parallelcommunicate
// adapt the sequence to safety, business impact and available evidence

First priority: confirm and contain

  • Verify the signal — is this a real compromise or a false positive?
  • Contain affected systems while preserving evidence where feasible. Follow the incident lead's direction on isolation, volatile evidence and any shutdown or restart; immediate safety and containment needs may change the order.
  • Start an incident log: timestamps with time zones, actions, decisions, owners and evidence sources. Preserve originals and record any collection or handling limitations.

Next: assess scope and affected access

  • What was accessed, from where, since when? Pull authentication logs, VPN records, and endpoint telemetry before retention windows eat them.
  • From a trusted environment, plan credential rotation, token revocation and session invalidation according to exposure, privilege and service dependencies. Avoid signalling completion while attacker access remains.
  • Identify affected data and involve qualified legal or privacy advisers promptly to determine any notification duties and deadlines. They depend on the jurisdiction, facts and applicable agreements.

In parallel: communicate and stabilise

  • Use a designated incident lead and agreed internal and external communication owners. Choose a trusted channel if the ordinary email or identity system may be compromised.
  • Notify legal counsel and, where applicable, your insurer — before making public statements.
  • Do not pay, promise, or publish anything under pressure without advice.

The mistakes that make it worse

Avoid unnecessary evidence changes, unsupported public statements and response coordination over a potentially compromised channel. Record why urgent containment actions were taken, then use a post-incident review to address root causes and lessons.

Prepare before an incident through an agreed response plan, named decision owners, reliable contacts and exercises. The NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 guidance places response within wider cybersecurity risk management.

Concerned about any of this in your environment?

ABZSECURE helps organisations test, validate and remediate these issues with reproducible evidence, not scanner output alone. Start with a no-obligation conversation.

Published by ABZSECURE.

Discuss your security →